Trans Friend

  Whatever the outcome of the current debate over gender reassignment, whatever laws we end up with, I will always believe that if someone wants to change their gender they should be allowed to do so, and they should be welcomed into the community of their adopted gender.   Clearly there are some who don’t accept that view.  If my beliefs became universal there wouldn’t be many questions left to answer. In fact I can’t think of one. Those societies who share my view are relaxed and ready to move on.  But if you are of the view that trans people shouldn’t exist, or shouldn’t be treated according to their adopted gender, then there are lots of questions you need to answer. You can’t just move on.  The Times published a letter from a doctor who suggested that gender disphoria is a mental illness. My first reaction was that I’m pleased he’s not my GP. But how does he propose to treat this “mental illness”. Conversion therapy, which seems to me to be just a renamed f...

  When I was growing up there was a young man in the West Country who had lost a leg in some sort of accident. Rather than feel sorry for himself he decided to try to overcome his disability on the sports field. He took up high jumping. He would hop rapidly up to the bar and perform a forward roll onto his back on the other side. After a lot of practice he got to be pretty good and started to win competitions against able bodied athletes. But then complaints were made, on the grounds that he had an unfair advantage; his centre of gravity was higher than normal by reason of his missing leg, and this made it easier to clear the bar. So the Amateur Athletics Association banned him from competition.   There was an understandable uproar, and his case was reconsidered, though after the initial novelty the story faded from the papers so I don’t know the outcome. I remember thinking that perhaps the AAA was afraid young men all across the country might start having their legs amputate...

Alas politicians today seem to base their policies on focus groups and surveys of public opinion. They lick their forefingers, raise them to the sky and follow the prevailing wind. True leaders who have a strong conviction and pursue it, sometimes changing the national mood, have gone.   The political response to the Supreme Court ruling has been limp to say the least. The main parties have all said that the ruling gives clarification, which it doesn’t. It introduces a huge anomaly in which trans people have two legal sexes at once.  Is that clear enough for you?  The right, not surprisingly, has misrepresented the ruling as a blanket decision that men are men and women are women. As far as they are concerned it’s all woke nonsense and this clears it up. Farage predictably, has said “the lunacy is over!” Alas no, he is still with us.  Sadly the progressive parties have kept their heads down and failed to point out what the ruling really means. Keir Starmer is, I susp...

  In 1857 there was a case before the Supreme Court of The United States, Dred Scott v Sanford. It found that black people could not be citizens of the USA.   I’m sure there were people celebrating on the steps of the court after the judgement was announced. There would have been people for whom it was common sense from the beginning. White people are white, black people are black, you can’t change from one to the other, it’s simple biology.  So it’s ok to keep them out of our toilets (and bars and restaurants and buses…)  I expect they thought they were on the right side of history.  Sound familiar? 

  One of the things I don’t understand about the trans debate in this country is why it generates such heat. Why do we have people shouting and screaming “the only good terf is a dead terf” or “women are born not made” depending on which side of the debate they’re on?   Internationally this isn’t the norm. Argentina, Malta, Ireland, Portugal and Denmark have adopted very relaxed and trans friendly laws with little or no fuss or push back. I’m sure there must have been opponents, but by and large there seems to have been a collective shrug, and trans people were welcomed into their adopted gender communities without fuss or incident.  The exceptions include the USA which has a similar confrontational attitude to the UK, driven by the culture wars, with some States being trans friendly while others adopt anti trans legislation. Poland has a lot of suspicion and hostility, but that looks to me to be bound up with religious conservatism, as is their national politics.  R...

  If I were trans and could ”pass” as I gather trans people say, I would keep my head down, not say anything and allow everyone to assume that I was my adopted gender. I’m sure there are many people out there who do exactly that.   There are others who proudly claim the label “trans”, tell the world all about it, and share their experience. I admire people like that very much. There is no doubt that doing so attracts what one might call “unwanted attention” which will include insults and threats.  I am thinking about people like Abigail Thorn, the philosophy educator and YouTuber, who could certainly pass, but chooses not to. I recently watched a video interview with her. I found it very emotional. She made it clear that she had no choice, that she simply couldn’t continue to pretend; that the process was emotionally draining; and that now she is completely at peace with herself.  It’s people like her who will eventually persuade the vast majority of people, cis peop...

  You expect The Daily Mail, The Telegraph or The Daily Express to be horrendously reactionary. But I’m not sure why the Times newspaper is so anti trans. It is publishing opinion pieces suggesting that the implications of the recent High Court ruling are much more far reaching than they actually are. And they are presenting trans rights activists purely as crazed anarchists destroying property and threatening violence against their opponents. They have headlines like “unhinged trans activists show true colours”.   By the way, the same article suggested that trans activists are misinterpreting the judgement, when actually most trans deniers are doing exactly that by saying that the ruling means that trans men have to use the ladies and trans women have to use the gents. Let’s be crystal clear. It means no such thing.  And although many threats have been made by trans activists, they are just threats made in anger. I don’t believe any of such threats have been carried out....